Home Page
  • Home
  • Biographical Note
  • Quick Links Wall
    • Only Podcasts . . .
  • Events / Appearances
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Academic Publications
    • Community Publications
    • Book Review Publications
  • Witness Canada's Algonquin Genocide
  • IWagWid: Indigenous Women & Girls with Disabilities
  • Gehl Blogging
    • Gehl Blog Index
    • Subscribe
  • Community Resources
    • Cultural Appropriation Detector
    • Indigenous Knowledge Protection Act
    • Follow the Turtle
    • Ally Bill of Responsibilities
    • My Wampum Bundle
    • Truth that Wampum Tells
    • Genocide: A Personal Manifesto
    • Anishinaabeg Thinking
    • Canadians Need to Know
    • Cupcake Feminism
    • Knowledge is Wholistic
    • The Metaphoric Turtle
    • Oh Canada
    • Treaty Federal Order
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Biographical Note
  • Quick Links Wall
    • Only Podcasts . . .
  • Events / Appearances
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Academic Publications
    • Community Publications
    • Book Review Publications
  • Witness Canada's Algonquin Genocide
  • IWagWid: Indigenous Women & Girls with Disabilities
  • Gehl Blogging
    • Gehl Blog Index
    • Subscribe
  • Community Resources
    • Cultural Appropriation Detector
    • Indigenous Knowledge Protection Act
    • Follow the Turtle
    • Ally Bill of Responsibilities
    • My Wampum Bundle
    • Truth that Wampum Tells
    • Genocide: A Personal Manifesto
    • Anishinaabeg Thinking
    • Canadians Need to Know
    • Cupcake Feminism
    • Knowledge is Wholistic
    • The Metaphoric Turtle
    • Oh Canada
    • Treaty Federal Order
  • Contact
Search by typing & pressing enter

YOUR CART

2/25/2013 4 Comments

Protecting Indigenous Knowledge

Picture
© Dr. Lynn Gehl, Gii-Zhigaate-Mnidoo-Kwe

Processes of colonization have been harmful to Indigenous people.  Not only in terms of the denial of access to land and resources to live a good life, but also in terms of the way knowledge has been gathered, interpreted and constructed into institutions, policy, and law; as well as the process of dissemination.  This colonial process of knowledge production is no longer acceptable practice as Indigenous people have had enough.

There has been a paradigm shift in the academic world.  Today, it is expected that Indigenous communities and people be included in defining and determining research questions, defining and determining research methodologies, and defining and determining the process of interpreting data.  We are also involved in defining and determining acceptable means of disseminating the knowledge.  Standards of best practices must apply.

The Tri-Council Policy is a world model for ethical academic research.  Chapter ten of the policy is dedicated to offering guidelines regarding research with Indigenous communities and people.  Interestingly, the Tri-Council Policy clearly states that it does not override or replace the ethical guidelines that sovereign Indigenous Nations have in place – both oral and written.  As such, in many situations it is necessary for researchers to undergo two research ethics review processes before moving ahead in their research.  The Mi’kmaw Ethics Watch is one such Indigenous body which assures Mi’kmaw Indigenous knowledge is both respected, and protected from outsiders doing harmful and interfering research.

If you are in a cyber-net community conducting research of any kind without the full and informed consent of the people, you are engaging in unethical research practices.  Keep in mind here that community is no longer defined as on the ground.  Rather, it is more broadly defined.  While it may be argued that news reporting research is not bound to the rules of the Tri-Council Policy, but rather the rules of journalism where knowledge and information obtained in public settings such as social media outlets is publishable by law, this rationale is poorly and incorrectly applied to Indigenous communities, Indigenous knowledge, and Indigenous intellectual property.  In this situation the laws and policies of Indigenous Nations − again, both oral and written codes of ethics − override the rules of western journalism.

Further to this, Article 31 of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, an international norm that has force, states: “Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain, control, protect and develop their cultural heritage, traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions, as well as the manifestations of their sciences, technologies and cultures, including human and genetic resources, seeds, medicines, knowledge of the properties of fauna and flora, oral traditions, literatures, designs, sports and traditional games and visual and performing arts. They also have the right to maintain, control, protect and develop their intellectual property over such cultural heritage, traditional knowledge, and traditional cultural expressions.”

For news reporters to enter into our spaces, communities, cyber-net communities included, and mine our minds and experiences for knowledge, while at the same time not asking Indigenous people for guidance in shaping the research, or asking for guidance in how the research should be disseminated; and further to gain economically from the knowledge yet give nothing back to the people, is unethical.  Furthermore, for a news reporter to argue otherwise based on the rules of western journalism as the rationale that guides their work is unethical, not to mention an oxymoron.  Let’s face it, if you are truly interested in serving Indigenous people, and our needs and our knowledge, it makes no sense to simply ignore our rules and laws of ethics.

Indigenous moral codes operate through an internal locus of control, meaning individuals are socialized in a way where we are expected to govern our own behaviour from the inside, rather than through external apparatus such as police, fines, written laws, courtroom proceedings, and judges.  In situations where a person’s moral code is not working, community members and allies will come forward and tell you where to go, and where precisely to put your desire for knowledge, the goal being to end unethical research.

The Idle No More movement gained currency through the tools of social media.  Our Facebook groups, Facebook Fan Pages, and Facebook Event pages are more than simply places for you to mine for knowledge through your narrow models of research, while at the same time offer nothing back in return for the knowledge.  If you are engaging in this method of research, this is analogous to the colonizer mining Indigenous land for resources where Indigenous communities gain nothing in return.

Picture
Dr. Lynn Gehl is an Algonquin Anishinaabe-kwe from the Ottawa River Valley.  She has a section 15 Charter challenge regarding the continued sex discrimination in The Indian Act, she is an outspoken critic of the Ontario Algonquin land claims and self-government process, and she recently published a book titled Anishinaabeg Stories: Featuring Petroglyphs, Petrographs, and Wampum Belts.  In her spare time she carves nickel-sized turtles.  You can reach her at lynngehl@gmail.com and see more of her work at www.lynngehl.com


4 Comments
Ellen Marie Jensen link
2/26/2013 04:48:43 pm

Lynn is awesome! The Bill of Responsibilities is long overdue for Indigenous peoples' communities.

Reply
Lynn Gehl
2/28/2013 01:36:32 am

Miigwetch Ellen Marie

Reply
Line Merrette link
4/13/2013 04:05:06 am

Ditto about teaching.

How can someone claim to teach ABOUT FN spiritualities if no FN persons were consulted? I have asked to be enrolled in this graduate course https://www.teluq.ca/siteweb/etudes/offre/cours/TELUQ/REL%207314/?p_herit=etu (if they accept me). And if they do, I will be paying attention and asking questions, and if I feel a complaint is justified, I will make one.

This is a course that is supposed to be geared to teachers who will be teaching the fairly new Québec high school "Ethics and religious culture" course (it was put in place 7 years ago).

The whole idea of that course is to make all Québécois children aware and teach respect and tolerance about various religious traditions, but I am not even sure what the professor http://www.criec.uqam.ca/Page/louis_rousseau.aspx did as far as FNs are concerned. I have not seen the material yet. I don't want to presume bad faith, as he seems to have devoted part of his career to studying racism etc. But I find it strange that nowhere they say FNs have been consulted.The research chair and department is not geared exclusively to FNs.

If they start on the wrong foot, it might make a lot of damage. I don't want to jump to conclusions yet, but...

My point of comparison is OISE at the University of Toronto where there are numerous FN professors and researchers.

If you want, I will let you know how this turns out.

Reply
Terry Debassige
2/11/2014 01:24:28 am

This I believe is the essence of our societies. It is so very fragile yet produces one of the most resilient and mutually
beneficent environments for respect, caring and nurturing.
In the Jesuit Recollections there is one exchange where the Europeans ask why there is no crime among the Indians. The Indians answer that everything we do is in the eyes of the Creator.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

To subscribe to Lynn's Blog: click here
To subscribe to Lynn's Newsletter:  click here
To follow Lynn on her Public Facebook Page: click here
To subscribe to Lynn's YouTube channel:  click here
To book Lynn as a speaker: click here
To contact Lynn: click here
Copyright Dr. Lynn Gehl,  All Rights Reserved

Picture